|
Introduction to Psychological
Testing
Psychology 3380 Syllabus
PRINCIPLES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING
Fall, 2006
INSTRUCTOR: Maureen A. McCarthy, PhD
OFFICE: SS 213-C
EMAIL:
Maureen_McCarthy@kennesaw.edu
PHONE: 770-423-6296 or (Psychology Office 770-423-6225)
OFFICE HOURS: Monday and Wednesday 1:00-2:00, Monday 3:30-4:30
and by appointment*
LECTURE: MW, 2:00-3:15, Room SS 225
SECTION: 10453
Catalog Course Description
Prerequisites: PSYC 2201
Designed to introduce the principles that
underlie the development, use and interpretation of psychological
assessment tools. Topics include: test construction, survey
development, scaling, norming, assessment interpretation issues and
psychological assessment applications in industrial, vocational,
clinical and research settings. Additionally, psychological
assessment will be discussed n terms of social, legal, and ethical
concerns.
Required Text
Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2005). Psychological testing and
assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (6th
ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
*Instructor
Availability: I believe
that it is important that students have access to assistance in a
timely fashion. Assistance will be available through three avenues.
First, I will be available through email 7 days a week. I will check
my email at least once daily and I will respond to your questions as
soon as possible. Second, you may come by my office during office
hours. If you can not meet with me during this time, I will be happy
to make an appointment at a time that is more convenient for your
schedule.
Attendance
Policy:
There is an expectation that students will attend class regularly
and on time. Students are responsible for any material covered or
announcements made in class during their absence. Any student
who stops attending class should officially withdraw from the
course.
Grades:
Grades will be assigned based on the university established scale
for letter grades (i.e., 90%-A, 80% - B, 70% - C, 60% - D, below 60%
- F). Note: A minimum grade of a C is required for psychology
majors.
Classroom
Integrity: Students are
adults and will be treated as such. In return, there is an
expectation that students will behave as responsible, intelligent
individuals. Academic freedom is respected and must be honored at
all times by all persons. I am committed to creating a learning
environment that is respectful and intentionally inclusive. The
course will not espouse, foster, or harbor discrimination on the
basis of race, ethnicity, language, geographic region, resident
status, religious/spiritual and secular beliefs, family structure,
socioeconomic status, gender identity, sex, sexual orientation,
gender identity/expression, age, physical disability, or health
status. To create and preserve a
classroom atmosphere that optimizes teaching and learning, all
participants share a responsibility in creating a civil and
non-disruptive forum. Students are expected to conduct themselves at
all times in a manner that does not disrupt teaching or learning.
Instructors have the right to limit classroom discussion in order to
meet the educational objectives of the class session.
Academic Integrity: Every
KSU student is responsible for upholding the provisions of the
Student Code of Conduct, as published in the Undergraduate and
Graduate Catalogs. Section II of the Student Code of Conduct
addresses the University's policy on academic honesty, including
provisions regarding plagiarism and cheating, unauthorized access to
University materials, misrepresentation/falsification of University
records or academic work, malicious removal, retention, or
destruction of library materials, malicious/intentional misuse of
computer facilities and/or services, and misuse of student
identification cards. Incidents of alleged academic misconduct will
be handled through the established procedures of the University
Judiciary Program, which includes either an "informal" resolution by
a faculty member, resulting in a grade adjustment, or a formal
hearing procedure, which may subject a student to the Code of
Conduct's minimal one semester suspension requirement.
Specifically, regarding plagiarism and cheating, the Student Code
states: "No student shall receive, attempt to receive, knowingly
give or attempt to give unauthorized assistance in the preparation
of any work required to be submitted for credit as part of a course
(including examinations, laboratory reports, essays, themes, term
papers, etc.). When direct quotations are used, they should be
indicated, and when the ideas, theories, data, figures, graphs,
programs, electronic based information or illustrations of someone
other than the student are incorporated into a paper or used in a
project, they should be duly acknowledged (http://www.kennesaw.edu/judiciary/code.conduct.shtml#II)."
Specifically within the
Psychology Department: Although the Psychology Department
supports multidisciplinary and focused scholarly interests, we do
not ordinarily allow students to turn in (or modify) a paper from a
previous course or use the same paper for concurrent courses. If
students have references that apply to more than one paper, students
can use them but must rewrite how you use the citations. If there
are questions or concerns about potential violation of any of these
statements, students are encouraged to meet with the course
instructor to discuss these concerns. Also, refer to the current
edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological
Association for specific guidelines on APA format regarding
citations and references.
Specifically within this Course:
In addition to the aforementioned definition of plagiarism
unintentional plagiarism is also prohibited. Changing a few words in
a sentence and then citing the author is plagiarism AND using exact
quotations, with quotation marks and appropriate citations, is
prohibited in this course. To help you avoid both the problems of
what I call unintentional plagiarism (primarily attributable to
inappropriate paraphrasing) and overuse of quotations, the
information that follows clarifies differences between appropriate
and inappropriate paraphrasing. Unintentional or intentional
plagiarism may result in an automatic 0 for the paper.
Plagiarism can be intentional or
unintentional. Most often students unintentionally plagiarize a
published source. It is not enough to merely reference what you are
reading. You must either place the information you are using in
direct quotes or you must appropriately paraphrase the material. For
example, if you were to try to paraphrase the following quote:
“Detailed analyses revealed that with increased age adults in this time
management activity were less likely to perform self-paced tasks and
to attempt difficult auditory discrimination judgments” (Salthouse,
Hambrick, Lukas, & Dell, 1996, p. 305).
It is possible that you might try the
following paraphrase:
Analyses revealed that increased age adults in the time management
activity were less likely to perform self paced tasks (Salthouse,
Hambrick, Lukas, & Dell, 1996).
This paraphrase is incorrect,
even if you attach the appropriate citation. In other words, this
constitutes plagiarism! Instead you should try to summarize the
information in your own words. The following example is more
appropriate:
Researchers found that age inhibited willingness of participants to
initiate difficult tasks (Salthouse, Hambrick, Lukas, & Dell,
1996).
You will notice that this information
has been summarized and that this is a better example of a correct
paraphrase. It is important to realize that this paraphrase must
still be appropriately referenced. Additional information can be
found at: http://library.apsu.edu/guides/1_3_20.htm.
IF ANY MEMBER OF THE
CLASS HAS A DISABILITY THAT REQUIRES SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS, I WILL
WORK WITH YOU. PLEASE NOTIFY ME OF SUCH DISABILITY DURING THE FIRST
SCHEDULED CLASS MEETING.
Course
Objective:
In this course, you will be introduced to
the basic principles of psychological testing and measurement. In
other words, you will learn a set of basic skills that will allow
you to research advances in the field of testing and apply basic
statistical principles in your evaluation of new and available
instruments. Additionally, you will be provided with an overview of
widely used psychological tests. You will not learn how to
administer or interpret psychological tests
Learning
Outcomes:
Evidence of competency in these domains
will be evaluated on the basis of learning outcomes. In other words,
specific competencies should include:
- Define psychological
testing and identify forums for use.
- Define reliability
and validity.
- Apply principles of
reliability and validity when evaluating tests.
- Describe historical
influences of testing.
- Describe theories of
intelligence testing.
- Distinguish between
tests of intelligence.
- Identify personality
theories and assessments.
- Describe current
personality assessment methods
- Describe settings in
which psychological tests are used.
Exams:
Four exams, predominantly multiple-choice, will be administered
throughout the semester. Each exam will be weighted at 100 points.
The final exam is NOT cumulative, but information is cumulative, so
it is important to learn and retain the material.
It is not acceptable
to miss an exam. If an emergency precludes taking an exam at the
regularly scheduled time, the following actions must be taken. You
must provide written documentation substantiating the reason for
your absence within 24 hours of the exam. A make-up exam will be
administered immediately following Exam 4. The make-up exam will not
be the same as the originally administered exam.
Review of Test:
You will be required to review an assigned psychological test. A
standardized checklist will be provided. Late papers will be
penalized 10 points for every day late including weekends.
Extra Credit:
A maximum of 10 raw score
points may be earned toward extra credit. Participation in a
psychology experiment will result in 10 additional points. Extra
credit may also be earned by bringing in newspaper or periodical
articles (2 points per article) that include statistical analyses.
Extra credit will not be accepted after December 1, 2006.
Points
|
Exams (4 @
100 each) |
400 |
|
Test Review |
50 |
|
Total |
450 |
Course grades will be
calculated as a percentage of total points.
Tentative Class Schedule*
|
|
lecture |
Assignments |
|
August 21 |
Syllabus,
Overview |
|
|
August 23 |
Introduction
Interview with Buros Director |
Chapter 1 |
|
August 28 |
History |
Chapter 2 |
|
August 30 |
History |
Chapter 2 |
|
September 4 |
Labor Day |
|
|
September 6 |
Statistics |
Chapter 3 |
|
September 11 |
Exam 1 |
|
|
September 13 |
General
Considerations |
Chapter 4 |
|
September 18 |
Reliability |
Chapter 5 |
|
September 20 |
Reliability |
Chapter 5 |
|
September 25 |
Reliability |
Chapter 5 |
|
September 27 |
Validity |
Chapter 6 |
|
October 2 |
Test
Development |
Chapter 7 |
|
October 4 |
Exam 2 |
|
|
October 9 |
Intro to
Intelligence Testing |
(Test
Review Due) |
|
October
11* |
Intro to
Intelligence Testing |
Chapter 8
LAST DAY TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT ACADEMIC PENALTY |
|
October 16
|
Intelligence
Tests |
Chapter 9 |
|
October 18 |
Intelligence
Tests |
Chapter 9 |
|
October 23 |
School
Testing |
Chapter 10 |
|
October 25 |
School
Testing |
Chapter 10 |
|
October 30 |
Career
Assessment |
Chapter 16
(pp. 520-530) |
|
November 1 |
Review |
|
|
November 6 |
Exam 3 |
|
|
November 8 |
Personality
Assessment |
Chapter 11 |
|
November 13 |
Personality
Assessment |
Chapter 11 |
|
November 15 |
Personality
Tests |
Chapter 12 |
|
November 20 |
Fall Break |
|
|
November 22 |
Personality
Tests |
Chapter 12 |
|
November 27 |
Personality
Tests |
Chapter 12 |
|
November 29 |
Clinical and
Counseling |
Chapter 13 |
|
December 4 |
Review |
Chapter 13 |
|
December 11 |
Exam 4
12:30-2:00 |
|
|
|
|
|
* This schedule is
tentative. Announcements regarding changes in the schedule will
occur in class.
|